Category Archives: art

I Love Your Body Because I’ve Lost My Mind

To end the week we have this illustration from Lucie Nicoll Dickinson. Remember you can like the Bearded Eloise Facebook page HERE or to donate to the site HERE. 

* * * * *

For this piece, I chose to use the lyrics “I love your body because I’ve lost my mind” from Jarvis Cocker’s ‘I Never Said I Was Deep’. I fell in love with this song for its brutally honest, perfectly delivered lyrics, and if lyrics grab me like that (as Jarvis’ more often than not do), I feel like I have to do something with them. Here I wanted to disguise the dark nature of the lyrics under a ‘pretty’ pattern, to take the meaning out of the words and make it into something quite the opposite of how the statement was intended to be read.

Multiverse

Adam Lee Jones is currently studying Fine Art for Design at Batley School of Art and Design. He is an illustrator, photographer, writer, existentialist and thinker. His influences don’t necessarily come from visual art, but more from music and literature. If he was to describe his art style it would be to say that it is philosophical art, he does things that are natural to him.

* * * * *

Amy Winehouse by Laura Loveday

Laura Loveday, artist and friend of Bearded Eloise, has contributed to our totems series with this beautiful illustration of Amy Winehouse.

Laura had this to say:

“I can’t say that I was terribly surprised when Amy Winehouse died earlier this year, but I was very sad. I remember her when “Frank” came out, before the beehives, and I just really loved her down to earth NARF LANDAHN personality, amazing voice, her love of jazz and her fantastic lyrics. I think she spoke to a lot of people; they related to her, and she really made an impact on an industry which was getting kind of stagnant at the time. I drew this picture on the day she died. I’ll miss her. The lady lived the blues.
Thank you to Isis for inviting me to post my totem.”
You can have a look at more of Laura’s brilliant work HERE.

Fragmented Questions

Andy Warhol claimed that his images represented only what was perceivable on the surface. He and the images that he produced were simple things to be consumed; they ‘meant’ what they were.  Therefore their quality is as a mirror – the viewer has an emotional or social response, so its ‘message’ is whatever the viewer decides that it means about themselves or about the society they live in. The image is imbued with meaning simply by being looked at and responded to.

The context in which they were placed is what gave them the label of “art”. This perhaps raises the question of whether placing anything in an artistic frame, regardless of what it is, automatically gives it aesthetic worth. We consume thousands of images a day, all of which have meaning – that is, they are armed with the intention of selling a product, lifestyle or symptom. Why is an advert for Cup-a-Soup not considered to be art, but Andy Warhol’s reproduction of a Campbell’s soup tin one of the most famous pieces of artwork of all time?

Isis Vox/Emily Reynolds

Have You Wiped Properly?

This is a great little piece by a friend of Bearded Eloise, Alice Brightman. Like we said before, we love this kind of art. It’s quirky and fun and we think it’s great to see young female artists expressing themselves and having fun with it. Again, we’d recommend clicking on the picture to em-biggen it, as WordPress does tend to squish these things in a bit. Keep it coming, everyone!

 

Jordana Bevan

My lovely friend Ava Gardner has drawn this for us. It’s a picture of Jordana Bevan from Submarine, a film I haven’t seen yet but am told is excellent. (Click the image to see it bigger and in better quality. WordPress has squished it a little.)

We absolutely love this kind of cool, lo-fi art so if any of you want to share something similar we’d love to see it.

HOW TO…be “an artist”

  • make art

Isis Vox

Joe Murtagh Art

I first became aware of Joe Murtagh a few months ago, and since then his bold and exciting and sexy art has caught my eye time after time. I had a little chat with him about his work.


Who/what inspires you and informs your style?

I’ve always been fond of drawing, from an early age I’d copy things, from Disney cartoons to Marvel Comics. I’d get praise for what I’d done, which would encourage me to do more. Later in life, as a pupil then student, I’d pick up influences on the way – Gustav Klimt, Eric Gill, early Japanese art, Jamie Hewlett (Tank Girl), ‘Vogue’ magazine, ‘Face’ magazine (80s/90s), Nick Knight, music videos, album sleeves…Now, everything I see and hear goes into the mix. It’s taken me a while to make my own style and make it my own.

 

 

What made you choose the medium that you work in?

I always used to work in black biro pen, or acrylic paint. But after getting the hang of working with the mouse when drawing with Adobe illustrator I got heavily into doing digital artwork. I like the clean lines, but also the experimental side of using illustrator. I love the way I can change a colour palette quickly. It helps me to free up my approach. I often start a piece with a vague idea of what I’m doing, then hit a wall of uncertainty, then rescue it at the 11th hour.

To what extent does your art influence your life and your experiences and vice versa?

I get moody if I don’t create something for a while. Ideas well up inside and want to be expressed. Lately my work has been touching on lots of different subjects, all the big stuff – death, sex, guilt, beauty….all the timeless stuff really. I guess I have more to say now than I did when I was younger. It could be a confidence thing, or a life experience thing. I’ve seen my kids come into this world, and I’ve had loved ones leave it.
After completing a fine art degree I became a sculptor for a while, fell into teaching, then became a web/graphic designer, then a photo-retoucher. Now I’ve almost gone full circle and come back to what I really enjoy – drawing. I plan to create some paintings soon too.

 


Have you noticed any difference in the intent of your work and the way it is perceived by other people?

I don’t really know what people make of my artwork. I try to please myself, and make things that I haven’t seen or done before. If I feel excited by something I’ve made, and it gives me a buzz, then I’m happy. My focus lately has been on mortality and the notion of death being something we shouldn’t shy away from. The Buddhist notion that you can’t fully appreciate life unless you accept the fact that we are all at some point going to die, fascinates me. If anything, that seems to be sprinkled over everything I do. And of course balanced out by my use of colour. I get obsessed with certain colours. You may have noticed!

 

 

People are forced to swallow thousands of images a day in advertising; how do you ensure that your art has an impact on people and cuts through the mass of bullshit? -

I’ll buy Vogue magazine and eat up the adverts! Which is probably one reason way I dabbled in fashion photo retouching, and still feature the female figure in a lot of my artwork.
My influences are pop culture, but I know what you mean. There is so much coming at you, and a lot of it is very samey, very copy cat, and becoming dull for me. The same goes for a lot of graphic design and illustration. Too many people copying each other, using the same techniques and the same images and themes. Maybe that’s one of the downsides of technology, people think you can just click a button and hey presto, you’ve created something unique. Because there’s so much of the same work out there, it makes things bland. People need to show some personality in their artwork, that is the point after all.

 

 

What is your definition of art? -

I have no one definition of art. There are so many definitions of art. Like there are many definitions of what makes a good song etc, or what is love? For me, at this moment in time, my definition of art is to ask questions that aren’t so easy to ask in words. A lot of how we feel, how we live our lives, what drives our deepest darkest passions are not so easy to communicate in words. Art, be it visual, drama, music, the written word, should all (in my opinion) put us in the here and now. Helping us reflect on what’s really important to us.

 

If you want to have a look at Joe’s work or want to buy a print, he has an online shop here.

 

Crime as Art

Can crime ever be art? Can it hold aesthetic values, altogether separate from the ethical ambiguities that it presents? Can bombing be a form of performance art? Can civil disobedience be a type of living sculpture? Does crime have any values that render it beautiful, worthwhile, outside of moral judgement?  Can we really ever know any of this?

Many artists and writers have toyed with the idea in their works. John Waters, in his 1974 film Female Trouble, supported the premise that “crime is beauty”. Inspired by his visits to Tex Watson, infamous for his involvement with the Manson Family, Waters weaved a tale featuring petty crime, prostitution, torture and disfigurement. At the climax of the film a character shouts out “WHO WANTS TO DIE FOR ART?” and shoots into a crowd, killing many onlookers. Similarly, Jean Genet used his novel Our Lady of the Flowers to explore this theme. The beauty and aesthetic worth he finds in the lives of criminals and the underclass of society is absorbing and eerie in equal measure.

The question of what exactly constitutes art has been discussed for centuries. The Impressionists were rejected by the intelligentsia of their day, and Andy Warhol’s mass produced images of mass produced products also posed a similar question. How exactly can we define what art is? Theoretically, this could mean that anything (including crime) can be classed as art.

Art can kill – metaphorically – reality, answering to its own laws. Crime can do this too – sometimes literally. The obsession with serial killers that is prevalent across society can also provide some pointers. Newspapers and broadcasts are filled with the details of murders and rapes, things too horrifying for words. We should look away: but we don’t. Crimes like murder can produce a sense of awed horror in one’s mind, placing us on an uncertain precipice between fear and reverence. Browse the internet for a little while and you’re bound to find people obsessed with serial killers – many of them teenagers, also obsessed with contemplating their own mortality. This seems to indicate that crime, like art, can forge something almost transcendental; something ethereal and sacred.

 

 

Perhaps what makes something “art”, and not merely “beautiful”, is the intent. Most people would probably think that a urinal in a pub toilet is not art and holds no aesthetic value. But reproductions of Marcel Duchamp’s Fountain are on display in art galleries across the world. Performance artists have since attempted to deface it, with Yuan Chai stating that “Duchamp said himself; it’s the artist’s choice. He chooses what is art”.

So perhaps an assault or murder holds no aesthetic value in and of itself. But how the viewer appropriates that incident can change it. Literally anything can be transformed into art. We must abandon the dogma that art is a lofty, untouchable thing. It is transcendental, and everywhere. Crime IS art – but then so is everything else.

by Isis Vox